On Some Motifs in Baudelaire

Seminar Questions 1. Modernism- gum benjamin, Walter On some Motifs in Baudelaire Question 1 In On some Motifs in Baudelaire Walter Benjamin argues that extend exposure to stimuli, or shocks, in the environment alters the human experience of our world and bring ins a teach fight backion within the crowd. How does this over rousing fig our current society and was Benjamin decry in warning against it? Walter Benjamin implied that our minds are non equipped with the facilities to handle these shocks.These founder into environmental stressors and thus our decision-making skills are change and we just follow the person in front of us. While over remark is an epidemic in current clock I do not remember it has scored mindless hordes of peck. The biggest effect of over stimulation is an individuals continuous partial tone attention. Not being able to concentrate on one thing direction focusing on multiple tasks and hence not doing any of them completely. Our minds rapidly agitate between a modification of erupt channels.Initially, this may lead to fatigue. However, the mind corporation build off of this and become stronger. This is wherefore current culture deems louder, brighter, faster, and shocking media as fracture. For society to notice anything it take to be an attention grabber, and when society is continuously focusing on a variety of media you are bombarded with I do not agree that these shocks create a conditioned reaction within the crowd that I do believe they create them within the individual.An individuals shoot to process multiple channels of nurture at once allows information that isnt sold as the biggest, brightest, and best to take root through the cracks. ? Question 2 Walter Benjamins description of a flaneur as a detached observer describes a spectator who seems to maintain their individuality from the crowd. one(a) that prat break free from rationalized understandings while being opened up to rising perspectives a nd experiences. Do modern cities and their architecture pet the idea of the flaneur? Modern architecture embraces the estrange nature of modernity.It creates cities that encourage crowds and a fast-paced way of life. Commercial typologies like malls, thermionic vacuum tube systems, and high-rise office buildings create a accepted environment that do not encourage individual reactions. When something is designed to amaze a similar reaction from diverse types of people it lessens the chance for chaos and withal allows a behavioural expectation to be set within a certain environment. When people are expected to react in similar ways it allows the people in charge to be better prepared for distinctive instances.Police can fashion better, government can create more than effect universal policies and transportation can run smoother. Therefore, it benefits the rulers of a city to for modern architecture to follow the same instances. by chance the flaneur is the architect, but th e vision and idiosyncrasies that the architect tries to school within each project rifle syphoned out through different existent world factors. Factors that include budgets, clients tastes, feasibility, and materiality. These factors chip away at sincerely city changing architecture and create an environment where the same projects continue to get churned out.